Tuesday, August 5, 2008

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit L02773316 L01432062 L24033516 jurisdoctorstud Christian Milan



[Federal Circuit Seal]
Paul R. Michel
Chief Judge

Jan Horbaly
Circuit Executive
and Clerk of Court

United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
717 Madison Place, N.W.
Washington D.C. 20439
(202) 633-6550

Directions

Clerk’s Office Hours:
9–5, Monday – Friday, EST
Seminar Disclosure




United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

About the Court | PACER | Opinions & orders | Rules & forms | Calendar | Dispositions | Audio | Information | Statistics | Mediation | Employment | Judicial Conduct or Disability
Announcements
NEW!

2009 Calendar Available: The Calendar of Public Sessions for the Fiscal Year 2009 (October 2008 to September 2009) is available at this link.

Circuit Mediation Office Second Quarter Statistics: The Circuit Mediation Office has issued its Second Quarter 2008 Statistics, available at this link.

Chief Judge Michel Speaks on the State of the Court: Addressing attendees at the court’s Judicial Conference, Chief Judge Paul R. Michel affirmed that “The State of the Court is characterized by great experience, extraordinary diversity, intense engagement, national integration, growing efficiency and increasing expedition.” Read the full text of the Chief Judge’s address here.

Rules for Judicial Conduct and Judicial Disability Proceedings:Mandatory rules for judicial conduct and judicial disability proceedings, adopted by the Judicial Conference of the United States on March 11, 2008 take effect on April 10, 2008 and are available at this link.

Federal Circuit Will Sit in Silicon Valley in November 2008: The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit will hold hearings in several locations in Silicon Valley, California during the week of November 3, 2008. Santa Clara University School of Law, Stanford University School of Law and the United States District Courts in San Francisco and San Jose will each host a panel of judges for oral argument during that week.

Judges of the Federal Circuit Sitting by Designation: The Chief Justice assigns circuit judges to sit by designation with another circuit court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 291. Thus far in 2008, three Federal Circuit judges have sat by designation with a sister circuit. Five judges of the Federal Circuit had the opportunity to sit by designation with three sister circuits during calendar year 2007. A list of the Federal Circuit judges who have been so designated is available for 2007 and 2008.

Visiting Judges Sitting with the Federal Circuit: Since September 2006, twenty seven judges from circuit and district courts around the country have sat with the Federal Circuit. A list of the visiting judges who have sat with the court through June 2008 is available here.
Court Rules & Forms

* Rules and Forms
* Form 21, application for admission to the Federal Circuit Bar.

Opinions, Calendars & Dispositions

* Opinions & Orders.
* Last week’s disposition sheet of Federal Circuit cases
* Current week’s disposition sheet of Federal Circuit cases
* New cases filed in the last 90 days [plain text].
* New cases filed in the last 90 days [Excel spreadsheet].
* Pending Argument Calendar
* Calendar of Public Sessions October 2007 to September 2008.
* Calendar of Public Sessions October 2008 to September 2009.

Court Information

* About the Court
* Docket Information (PACER).
* Phone numbers and contacts
* Frequently Asked Questions
* Biographies of Federal Circuit judges
* Audio files of oral arguments are available. Counsel should read the guidelines for oral arguments.
* Disclosure of privately funded educational programs
* Directions to the court
* The Guide for Motions Practice answers common questions about motions
* Visiting Judges Sitting with the Federal Circuit 2006 to the present.
* Members of the Federal Circuit Advisory Council
* Court Mediation Program
* Statistics
* Law Clerk Hiring Policy

Submit your comments or questions about this website to the webmaster. This address cannot be used for communications with the Clerk’s Office or judges’ chambers.
Friday, August 01, 2008 8:47 AM
USA.gov Web Portal

Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts L02773316 L01432062 L24033516 jurisdoctorstud Christian Milan

Federal Judiciary
About U.S. CourtsNewsroomLibraryCourt LinksFrequently Asked QuestionsEmploymentContact Us
whiteline
1x1_amarelo
U.S. District Courts
1x1_amarelo
County/District Court Locator
Electronic Court Records
Federal Court Fees
Federal Court Interpreters
Jury Duty
Post Judgment Interest Rates
Subpoena Regulations
Statistical Reports

button Return to uscourts.gov



United States District Courts


The United States district courts are the trial courts of the federal court system. Within limits set by Congress and the Constitution, the district courts have jurisdiction to hear nearly all categories of federal cases, including both civil and criminal matters. Every day hundreds of people across the nation are selected for jury duty and help decide some of these cases.

There are 94 federal judicial districts, including at least one district in each state, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. Three territories of the United States -- the Virgin Islands, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands -- have district courts that hear federal cases, including bankruptcy cases. (Printable Circuit/District map - pdf)

Bankruptcy courts are separate units of the district courts. Federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over bankruptcy cases. This means that a bankruptcy case cannot be filed in a state court.

There are two special trial courts that have nationwide jurisdiction over certain types of cases.

1. The Court of International Trade addresses cases involving international trade and customs issues.
2. The United States Court of Federal Claims has jurisdiction over most claims for money damages against the United States, disputes over federal contracts, unlawful "takings" of private property by the federal government, and a variety of other claims against the United States.


whiteline

About The U.S. Courts | Newsroom | Library | Court Links | FAQs | Employment Opportunities | Contact Us | Search

This page is maintained by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts on behalf of the U.S. Courts.
The purpose of this site is to function as a clearinghouse for information from and about the Judicial Branch of the U.S. Government.

Privacy and Security Notices

Judicial Branch of the U.S. Government L02773316 L01432062 L24033516 jurisdoctorstud Christian Milan




Federal Judiciary
About U.S. CourtsNewsroomLibraryCourt LinksFrequently Asked QuestionsEmploymentContact Us
whiteline

Court Links
button Other Judiciary Links

Print Circuit Map
Circuit Map (pdf)
buttonReturn to uscourts.gov


1. Choose the court you want to locate: 2. Search by:
All Courts Court of Appeals
District Court Bankruptcy Court
Probation Office Pretrial Services Office

Zip Code County & State
City & State Area Code
Circuit All Locations
Zip Code:
United States Courts of Appeals and United States District Courts by Geographic Boundaries


Other Judiciary Links:
U.S. Supreme Court U.S. Court of International Trade
Court of Appeals for Veterans' Claims U.S. Party/Case Index - PACER
Judicial Fellows Program U.S. Tax Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Federal Judges Association
U.S. Court of Federal Claims Federal Court Clerks Association
U.S. Federal Claims Court - ECF National Conference of Bankruptcy Judges
U.S Sentencing Commission Federal Magistrate Judges Association
Central Violations Bureau International Association for Court Administration
Federal Judical Center National Conference of Bankruptcy Clerks
Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation


whiteline

About The U.S. Courts | Newsroom |Library |Court Links |FAQs | Employment Opportunities |Contact Us| Search

This page is maintained by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts on behalf of the U.S. Courts.
The purpose of this site is to function as a clearinghouse for information from and about the Judicial Branch of the U.S. Government.

Privacy and Security Notices

The National Association of Women Judges L02773316 L24033516 L01432062 jurisdoctorstud Christian Milan

NAWJ The National Association of Women Judges Join NAWJ!
Member Directory
District Information
District Information
District Information
Board of Directors
Board of Directors
Board of Directors
Resource Board
Resource Board
Resource Board
Committees
Committees
Committees
Who We Are
Who We Are
Who We Are
History
History
History
Join NAWJ
Join NAWJ
Join NAWJ
Leadership
Leadership
Leadership
Contact Us
Contact Us
Contact Us
Staff
Staff
Staff
2007
2007
2007
2006
2006
2006
2005
2005
2005
2004
2004
2004
2003
2003
2003
2007
2007
2007
Midyear Conference
Midyear Conference
Midyear Conference
Regional Conference
Regional Conference
Regional Conference
Annual Conference
Annual Conference
Annual Conference
Past Annual Conferences
Past Annual Conferences
Past Annual Conferences
Past Regional Conferences
Past Regional Conferences
Past Regional Conferences
News
News
News
Calendar
Calendar
Calendar
Conferences
Conferences
Conferences
About Scholarships
About Scholarships
About Scholarships
Scholarship Winners
Scholarship Winners
Scholarship Winners
How to Apply
How to Apply
How to Apply
Internship Home
Internship Home
Internship Home
Internship Application
Internship Application
Internship Application
Internship Schedules
Internship Schedules
Internship Schedules
Internship Questions
Internship Questions
Internship Questions
Programs & Publications
Programs & Publications
Programs & Publications
Outreach Programs
Outreach Programs
Outreach Programs
Distance Learning Program
Distance Learning Program
Distance Learning Program
Organize a NAWJ Program
Organize a NAWJ Program
Organize a NAWJ Program
Legal Research
Legal Research
Legal Research
Scholarships
Scholarships
Scholarships
Internships
Internships
Internships
Statistics
Statistics
Statistics
Bar Associations
Bar Associations
Bar Associations
Courts
Courts
Courts
Organizations
Organizations
Organizations
Resources
Resources
Resources
About Sponsorship
About Sponsorship
About Sponsorship
Sponsor List
Sponsor List
Sponsor List
About
About
About

Happenings
Happenings
Happenings

Education
Education
Education

Links
Links
Links

Sponsors
Sponsors
Sponsors

Members Only
Members Only
Members Only
NAWJ photos


Welcome to the National Association of Women Judges

NAWJ is the nation’s leading voice for women jurists dedicated to preserving judicial independence, ensuring equal justice and access to the courts for women, minorities and other historically disfavored groups, providing judicial education on cutting-edge issues, and increasing the numbers and advancement of women judges at all levels to more accurately reflect their full participation in a democratic society. We provide unique opportunities for members to enrich their professional lives, keep abreast of important issues, and network while contributing to social justice. NAWJ welcomes both men and women, as well as judicial clerks, attorneys and law students. Our members include federal, state, tribal, military and administrative law judges at both the appellate and trial levels from every state in the nation. Read more about NAWJ.





Latest News Upcoming Events (see the full calendar)
7/28/2008 - AJS HONORS CHIEF JUDGE JUDITH S. KAYE WITH OPPERMAN AWARD FOR JUDICIAL EXCELLANCE
Chief Judge of the State of New York, Judith S. Kaye of the New York Court of Appeals, has been selected recipient of AJS’s Fifth Annual Dwight D. Opperman Award for Judicial Excellence to be presented later this year. READ MORE

7/28/2008 - AMERICAN INNS OF THE COURT NAMES HON. JUDITH CHIRLIN RECIPIENT OF PROFESSIONALISM AWARD
Hon. Judith C. Chirlin, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge was recognized by the American Inns of Court with its 2008 Ninth Circuit Professionalism Award. READ MORE

7/28/2008 - HON. SANDRA L. LYNCH FIRST WOMAN CHIEF JUDGE ON THE FIRST CIRCUIT OF THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
Judge Sandra L. Lynch became the ninth chief judge of the First Circuit Court of Appeals since Congress created the position in 1948, and the first woman to hold the post. READ MORE

5/28/2008 - NAWJ RESOURCE BOARD MEMBER BERNICE LEBER TO LEAD NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
June marks the beginning of NAWJ Resource Board member and Arent Fox partner, Bernice K. Leber’s term as President of the New York State Bar Association, the largest voluntary bar association in the US (72,000 members). READ MORE

5/5/2008 - HON. ELLEN F. ROSENBLUM RECEIVES ABA'S 2008 NELSON AWARD
In recognition of her superior contributions to its organization as a public lawyer, the American Bar Association will honor Judge Ellen F. Rosenblum of the Oregon Court of Appeals, and this year’s NAWJ Annual Conference chair, with its 2008 Nelson Award. READ MORE


NAWJ Mid West Regional Conference
August 27 - 29, 2008
Chicago, Illinois

NAWJ 30th Annual Conference - Keeping The Promise…
October 15 - 19, 2008
Portland, Oregon

National Executive Service Corps Fourth Annual Gala Dinner
October 29, 2008
New York, New York

NAWJ 31st Annual Conference
October 15 - 18, 2009
Memphis, Tennessee

NAWJ 32nd Annual Conference
October 13 - 17, 2010
San Francisco, California


Home | About | Happenings | Education | Links | Sponsors | Members Only
Copyright © 1999 - 2008 National Association of Women Judges.
All rights reserved. NAWJ is a 501C(3) organization. Last Updated: Monday, July 28, 2008
Privacy

The National Judges Association an Association of Judges L022773316 L01432062 L240335156 jurisdoctorstud Christian Milan


The National Judges Association
an Association of Judges

Home
About Us
Coming Events
Officers
By-Laws
Board Policies
The Gavel
Education Foundation



Annual Education Conference

June 14th-20th, 2008

Do you know what
you're missing in
"THE GAVEL"?
NJA Members are located in 25 different states:



[ About Us ] [ Coming Events ] [ Officers ] [ By-Laws ] [ Board Policies ] [ The Gavel ] [ Education Foundation ]

Hit Counter

The National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary L02773316 L24033516 L01432062

The National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary


Overview
Overview
Mission
Mission
By Laws
By Laws
Membership
Membership
News
News
Contact Us
Contact Us

Organizational Structure
Organizational Structure
NAALJ Foundation
NAALJ Foundation
Board of Governors
Board of Governors
Officers
Officers
Committee Assignments
Committee Assignments
Affiliate Organizations
Affiliate Organizations

Central Panel States
Central Panel States
Non Central Panel States
Non Central Panel States

Upcoming Conferences
Upcoming Conferences
Recent Conferences
Recent Conferences

Newsletter
Newsletter
Other Publications
Other Publications

Affiliate Organizations
Affiliate Organizations
Links
Links








O V E R V I E W

Click here for NEW
conference information!

Photos of 2006 NAALJ Conference held in Seattle, Washington

Check out our brand new Career Opportunities Page

New Members
Sign Up

The National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (NAALJ) is the largest professional organization devoted exclusively to administrative adjudication devoted to the executive branch of government. It is a non-profit corporation founded in 1974 in the state of Illinois. Its voting members include: state, federal, and local administrative law judges, administrative judges, hearing officers, referees, trial examiners, agency chairs and commissioners, as well as higher appellate authorities, exercising a wide variety of subject matter jurisdiction. Associate members include law professors and attorneys involved in administrative law. As of May 31, 2007 had approximately 700 dues paying members.

Currently NAALJ has members in every state as well as, Australia, Canada, the Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. The NAALJ organization includes many state affiliates such as the Arkansas Association of Administrative Adjudicators, the Georgia Association of Administrative Judiciary, the Illinois Association of Administrative Law Judges, the Iowa Association of Administrative Law Judges, the Kentucky Association of Administrative Adjudicators, the Louisiana Association of Administrative Law Judges, the Maryland and District of Columbia Association of Administrative Adjudicators, the Michigan Association of Administrative Law Judges, New York State Administrative Law Judges Association, the Oregon Administrative Law Judges Association, the Virginia Association of Administrative Law Judges and Hearing Officers, the Washington Administrative Law Judges Association, and the West Virginia Association of Administrative Law Judges.

NAALJ’s core functions are first, the enhancement of the quality of administrative justice and second, the furtherance of the process of alternate dispute resolution by means of arbitration and mediation. To those ends, NAALJ provides for exchanging ideas and information. It conducts seminars and conferences, publishes a journal and newsletter, and confers with officials of the state and federal governments on methods of improving administrative adjudication. NAALJ has adopted a Model Code of Conduct for State Administrative Law Judges, XVI J. NAALJ 279 (1994), and was a moving force behind the ABA Model Act for Creating a State Central Hearing Agency (Office of Administrative Hearings).

NAALJ is on the forefront in the fulfillment of the true and proper role of administrative adjudication within the larger science of jurisprudence. Administrative adjudication has existed since the very beginning of our country in the sense that commissions were created by George Washington as president and other early presidents for such functions as the assignment of specific executive responsibilities and calculations of veteran’s benefits from the time of the American Revolution and the creation of tariffs schedules for American ports. It is our fond hope that in the future our role will take its place in the larger structure of government.

American Medical Association Trial: Judge's Charge To Jury L02773316 L24033516 L01432062 jurisdoctorstud Christian Milan

Note: Performing your original search, American Association of Judge, in PubMed Central will retrieve 6242 citations.
Journal List > Cal West Med > v.54(5); May 1941
>Summary
Page Browse
PDF (743K)
Contents
Archive


Cal West Med. 1941 May; 54(5): 255–257.

PMCID: PMC1634014
Copyright notice
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION TRIAL: JUDGE'S CHARGE TO JURY
Full text
Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (743K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page.
icon of scanned page 255
255
icon of scanned page 256
256
icon of scanned page 257
257

Articles from California and Western Medicine are provided here courtesy of
BMJ Group Christian Milan L02773316 L24033516 L01432062 jurisdoctorstud
Write to PMC | PMC Home | PubMed
NCBI | U.S. National Library of Medicine
NIH | Department of Health and Human Services
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Freedom of Information Act

American Society for Clinical Pathology L02773316 L24033516 L01432062

American Society for Clinical Pathology
Chat Live Now

* pathologists
* residents
* laboratory professionals
* students
o laboratory science students
o medical students
* program directors
o residency programs
o laboratory science programs

* store
* |
* membership

* Home
* ePolicy News - April 1, 2008

ePolicy Special Report:
Judge Grants Temporary Injunction in Pathology Anti-Markup Lawsuit

After CMS Refuses to Grant an Unconditional Thirty Day Extension

A Federal judge has issued a temporary injunction in a lawsuit brought against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services for its efforts to prohibit clinicians from marking up the professional or technical component of anatomic pathology services they order but do not perform.

The injunction prevents the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) from implementing its anti-markup (anti-pod lab) rule until a trial or further order from the court. ASCP President Lee H. Hilborne, MD, MPH, FASCP, DLM(ASCP)CM noted that “while ASCP is disappointed that the judge granted a preliminary injunction in the case, we are hopeful that the lawsuit will ultimately be decided in CMS’s favor. At this point, the judge’s decision to grant the injunction appears to be based, not on the merits of the rule that is being challenged, but rather over a disagreement with CMS over the nature of an additional 30-day delay in the implementation of the anti-markup rule that was requested by the judge.”

The rule was a top advocacy priority of ASCP and resulted from thousands of emails written by ASCP members as part of ASCP’s Stop Pod Labs Now campaign. The rule, once implemented, will prohibit clinicians from marking up the professional or technical component of anatomic pathology services they order but do not perform. President Hilborne praised the CMS rule, calling it “critical to assuring that patients have fair access to pathology services that are provided in a manner consistent with ethical practices.”

On March 28, a hearing was held on the lawsuit by Judge Rosemarie Collyer to consider two motions: one requesting a temporary injunction barring CMS from implementing its anti-markup rule and the other from CMS requesting dismissal of the lawsuit. The judge indicated she was not yet ready to rule on the merits of the two motions, so she gave CMS until Monday, March 31 to agree to an additional thirty day extension on its implementation of the anti-markup rule. CMS, however, did not exactly provide Judge Collyer what she wanted. CMS granted the extension, but reserved the right to recoup the costs of any pathology services that violated the anti-markup rule billed during extension, if CMS wins the lawsuit. This was different than the previous extension that expired on March 31 under which no recoupment was allowed.

In response, Judge Collyer issued a preliminary injunction to preserve the status quo. The judge’s order effectively continues the extension that previously was in effect and prevents CMS from recouping the costs of any anatomic pathology services billed in violation of the anti-markup rule until there is a trial or further order from the court.

The lawsuit, Atlantic Urological Associates, P.A. et al v. Leavitt, lists the following as plaintiffs in the case: Atlantic Urological Associates, P.A.; Sam Michaels, M.D.; Rebecca Page; Urology Care, Inc.; Urology Center of Alabama, P.C.; and Uropath, LLC.

The anti-markup provision bars physician practices or suppliers from marking up the cost of the technical or professional components of a Medicare reimbursed anatomic pathology service if it is purchased from an outside supplier or performed at a site other than the “same building” of the billing practice or supplier. The new rules are the result of the work done by ASCP and its membership, thousands of whom wrote federal legislators and regulators urging that CMS block the mark-up of pathology services, as part of its Stop Pod Labs Now campaign and other members of the pathology and laboratory community (See November 2007 ASCP E-Policy News for more information).

When CMS published its final physician fee schedule for 2008, it had planned to apply the anti-markup restriction to all diagnostic services. It subsequently postponed implementation of the rule to diagnostic services other than anatomic pathology (See Feb. 2008 ASCP E-Policy News for more information and see second story).

According to the Federal Government’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit, CMS’s rationale for promulgating its anti-markup rule was a concern that allowing physician groups to “realize excessive profit when billing Medicare for services…may lead to patient and program abuse in the form of overutilization of services and may result in higher costs to the Medicare program.”

The arrangements engaged in by these entities and clinicians, according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General, “can distort medical decision-making, cause overutilization, increase costs and result in unfair competition.”
Congress
ASCP Announces Support for Cytology Proficiency Testing Legislation, Expresses Concern Regarding CMS Process to Revise Regulation

The ASCP Board of Directors is pleased to see recent changes to the Cytology Proficiency Testing (PT) Legislation, addressing the principles ASCP articulated regarding Cytology PT and incorporating specific ASCP recommendations to assure the public that the pathology community was concerned about health and safety of patients served by our laboratories. As a result, on April 1, 2008 the ASCP Board of Directors (BOD) announced support for H.R. 1237, the Cytology Proficiency Improvement Act of 2007.

In a positive development, the latest version of H.R. 1237 now captures the language found in S. 2510. S. 2510 underscores ASCP’s desired provisions including empowerment of the laboratory director in the PT process; the original House bill did not incorporate this key aspect into cytology PT. “ASCP is delighted to support the revised House legislation to modernize cytology PT and we are very pleased that the College of American Pathologists chose to modify the original legislation to include ASCP recommended provisions to empower the laboratory director,” stated ASCP President Lee H. Hilborne, MD, MPH, FASCP, FCAP, DLM(ASCP)CM. ASCP’s July 2007 document "Framework for a Revised Cytology PT Regulation (PDF)" outlines in detail this position. The newest legislation would replace the current PT program that focuses solely on an individual testing program with that of an annual CME requirement under the oversight of the laboratory director.

The ASCP is extremely disappointed that the regulatory process, under the domain of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), has been unable to revise the current PT regulations in response to the evidence presented by the scientific community through the CLIAC and other venues. These regulations were first expected at the end of 2006, then by December 2007, and now we are not sure of the next anticipated release. “What is most unfortunate is that the entire cytology/pathology community has been seeking an updated cytology PT regulation for the past three years—and in reality, for more than a decade,” stated Hilborne. Despite CMS’s lack of movement regarding modifying the regulations, the ASCP still intends to comment on the draft regulations whenever they are released. When the draft regulations are released by CMS, the ASCP recommends that the pathology community work collaboratively and present a unified response.
House Again Passes the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act

Last month, the U.S. House of Representatives again passed the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2007 (GINA), a landmark bill designed to protect Americans from genetic discrimination by employers and insurance companies. GINA prohibits health insurers and group health plans from charging higher premiums or denying coverage based on an individual’s genetic predisposition to a disease. The bill also makes it unlawful for employers to use genetic information when making decisions regarding hiring, firing, job placement or promotion decisions.

Sponsors of GINA hope the bill will allay public apprehension about participating in genetic studies. The bill had previously passed the house on April 25, 2007 with overwhelming support. Representatives passed GINA by a margin of 264-148 this time as part of the Paul Wellstone Mental Health and Addiction Equity Act of 2007 (H.R. 1424), introduced by Representative Patrick Kennedy (D-RI). This bill would require health insurance companies to offer benefits for mental health and substance-related disorders under group health plans. Representative Louise Slaughter (D-NY) attached GINA to the Kennedy bill, she explained, “because most mental health diseases are genetically linked; GINA is a natural addition.”

Companion legislation has been introduced in the Senate (S. 358) to prevent genetic discrimination and is currently in committee. It is unclear which bill the Senate will ultimately approve, but President Bush has indicated that he is ready to sign the bill once it is approved by Congress.
Laboratory Professionals Collectively Harness Political Clout
Seek Change from Capitol Hill Lawmakers

Members from the American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science (ASCLS), the American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP) and the Clinical Laboratory Management Association (CLMA) joined forces March 17-18 for their Annual Legislative Symposium and Hill Day. The three laboratory organizations bring in members from across the country to speak in a collective voice to legislators on Capitol Hill. Some 130 laboratory professionals took the issues of competitive bidding, the laboratory personnel workforce shortage and modernization of the clinical laboratory fee schedule to their respective Senators and Representative. The two-day legislative symposium kicked off with an explanation of the legislative and regulatory issues central to the laboratory profession as well as provided a “how to lobby” overview, with tips on meeting with Members of Congress, the organizational structure of Congress, and effective articulation of one’s message. The legislative symposium is designed to give laboratory professionals knowledge of the political process and to engage them in the process so that they can make a difference in the practice of their profession and ultimately in the care of their patients.
Society News
Hilborne Appointed to AMA Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement

ASCP President Lee H. Hilborne, MD, MPH, FASCP, FCAP, DLM(ASCP)CM has agreed to represent ASCP on the American Medical Association’s Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement. The consortium is composed of over 100 national medical specialty and state medical societies; the Council of Medical Specialty Societies; American Board of Medical Specialties and its member-boards; experts in methodology and data collection; the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

Consortium activities are carried out through cross-specialty work groups established to develop performance measures for physicians from evidence-based clinical guidelines for select clinical conditions. Dr. Hilborne looks forward to working with the College of American Pathologists and the entire field of medicine on this important project.
ASCP Hosts CCCLW Meeting in Chicago

The ASCP hosted the first quarter meeting of the Coordinating Council on the Clinical Laboratory Workforce (CCCLW) last month in Chicago. The CCCLW is a coalition of non-profit laboratory professional organizations, federal entities, and companies that have joined forces to address the shortage of clinical laboratory personnel and other issues in the profession.

CCCLW held a strategic planning session in January in which member organizations identified four strategic directions and formed workgroups to develop and implement initiatives in each area. ASCP will work with other member organizations on business initiatives to address the workforce shortage, activities aimed at improving the profile of the profession, and strategies to enhance recruitment. The 2007 ASCP Wage and Vacancy Survey, to be released in the coming months, will offer valuable data as the coalition moves forward with its activities.

The next CCCLW meeting is scheduled for June 9th. If you would like additional information on this group, contact Andrea Bennett at andrea.bennett@ascp.org.
resources: related to this section
documents


July 30, 2008


ePolicy Special Report:
Senate Approves ASCP-Supported Medicare Bill; ASCP Members Urged to Contact White House


July 1, 2008


ePolicy Special Report:
House Approves ASCP-Supported Medicare Bill


June 1, 2008


ePolicy Special Report:
Judge Dismisses Anti-Markup Lawsuit


May 1, 2008


March 4, 2008


August 30, 2007


September 12, 2007


September 30, 2007


November 2, 2007


December 2, 2007


January 1, 2008


January 21, 2008


February 4, 2008

* Email this page
* Print

Member Login
username:
*
password:
*
Remember Me

* Password Hint
* Login Assistance
* Help?

* Create Account
* Contact Us

How can ASCP help you?

* Pay 2008 dues
* Go to Education Home
* View events calendar
* Find or post a job
* Apply for certification
* Verify certification
* Maintain certification
* Buy a book
* Register for a meeting
* Take an online course
* Go to ajcp.com
* Go to labmedicine.com
* Learn about ASCP
* Sign up for GYN PT

* news
* ASCP journals

CDC Selects ASCP to Continue Fight Against HIV/AIDS
With the President’s signing of the HIV/AIDS reauthorization bill, the ASCP is again being called on by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to continue its efforts in strengthening laboratory services for the testing and monitoring of HIV/AIDS patients abroad. more...

Pathology and Lab Medicine News
Get the latest pathology and laboratory medicine news from ASCP's partnership website with Medscape. more...

ASCP Institute Seeks French & Portuguese Speaking Members
The ASCP Institute's global outreach program is seeking members who are fluent in French and/or Portuguese to translate education materials and serve as training facilitators and/or provide technical assistance in Haiti, Cote d'Ivoire, Rwanda and Mozambique. more...

Reactivity With TdT in Merkel Cell Carcinoma: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall
Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a well-known, high-grade, primary neuroendocrine carcinoma of skin that has characteristic morphologic and immunophenotypic features. Although it can occur at virtually any site, there is a predilection for the head and neck region and upper extremities. more...

Managing Workforce Health and Wellness
The cost of employee health care, including that for health care professionals, continues to rise and squeezes health care organizations just as it does in other industries. This timely feature addresses these issues and explores workforce challenges. more...

American Society for Clinical Pathology

Excellence in education, certification, and advocacy on behalf of patients, pathologists, and laboratory professionals

Copyright © 2008 by American Society for Clinical Pathology. All rights reserved.

certification | advocacy | outreach | members | education

about ascp | contact us | store | site map
From: *
Email: **
To: *
Email: **
Subject: *
Message:

ABA Judicial Division L01432062 L02773316 L24033516 jurisdoctorstud Christian Milan

American Bar Association - Defending Liberty, Pursuing Justice ABA Logo

* ABA Home
* Join
* Web Store
* About the ABA

* Division Home
* Membership
* Calendar
* Committees
* Contact Us
* Publications
* Leadership
* Conferences
* Diversity
* E-mail Lists
* News

ABA Web Store - Free Ground Shipping in August

*
Search: Advanced Search
Topics A-Z
* Print This | E-mail This

ABA Judicial Division

Honorable James A. Wynn, Jr.
"Fair and Impartial Judges: Guardians of the Rule of Law."

Welcome to the Judicial Division of the American Bar Association. While our tag line aspirationally declares that we are the “Voice of the Judiciary,” our status as the “Judicial Voice of the American Bar Association” makes us the most influential organization of judges in the world.

With over 4,000 members, we work to support an open, fair, and impartial judiciary through our programs, publications and initiatives. This year, we are partnered with ABA President William Neukom’s Rule of Law Initiative and the World Justice Project under the JD theme: “Fair and Impartial Judges: Guardians of the Rule of Law.” After all, a strong and independent judiciary is an integral part of promoting the rule of law, domestically and internationally.

President Neukom recognized the critical role of judges in the WJP by appointing two of our members to the WJP Commission – 9th Circuit U.S. Court Judge Margaret McKeown and Oregon Court of Appeal Judge Ellen Rosenblum; and three members to the WJP Advisory Commission – former JD Chair Leslie Miller; JD Program Chair, Justice Mark Martin and myself. With this leadership, we seek to ensure the presence of our members at each of the four international conferences as well as the domestic Rule of Law Conferences in each state.

We also seek to maximize the participation of our members on the various JD committees and as liaisons to other ABA entities. If members want to serve and offer their talents for the betterment of the JD, then we want to make sure we provide opportunities not only in the JD but in the other ABA entities that address judicial issues, such as the Standing Committee on Judicial Independence, Federal Judicial Improvements Committee, Commission on Racial and Ethnic Diversity in the Profession, and others.

The opportunity to become involved has never been better for our members. Be it with our highly successful Judicial Clerkship Program or through any of our many committee and liaison positions, we want your input. We are proud to serve you towards the aims of providing quality educational programs for judicial improvement and carrying out our initiatives to promote the public’s confidence and trust in the judiciary.

Honorable James A. Wynn, Jr., Chair
Judge Wynn's Welcome Video
Members in the Spotlight

Right arrow Hon. James A. Wynn Jr. will receive the 2008 Raymond Pace Alexander Award on July 30.
Read about it here

Right arrow Colonel (US Air Force, Retired) Linda Strite Murnane – recipient of the 2008 Margaret Brent Award.
Read about it here

Right arrow Internet blog reports on mock EDD Motions Hearing at Techshow 2008 involving Hon. Herbert Dixon.
Read about it here

Right arrow Hon. Herbert Dixon co-authors Judges’ Technology Tips for the LPM Section’s Law Practice Magazine.
Read about it here
More Members in the Spotlight
Headlines

Right arrow Judicial Division cosponsors Mediation in Criminal Matters: Survey of ADR and Restorative Justice Programs -- click here

Right arrow The Ohio State Bar Association is adopting the ABA’s Least Understood Branch project, a joint effort of the Judicial Division and the Standing Committee on Judicial Independence with the League of Women Voters (LWV); Justice at Stake (JAS); and the National Center for State Courts (NCSC) as participating entities. The project focuses on training lawyers and judges in speaking to the public on the importance of fair and impartial courts. -- click here
click here

Right arrow Better Pay for Federal Judges -- click here

Right arrow C-Span video recording of the National Conference of Federal Trial Judges Annual Meeting program, When the Public Judges its Judges: Fallout from Controversial Decisions -- click here

Right arrow ABAJournal.com article on the Jury Stamp -- click here
!-->
Latest News
Threats to Judicial Independence a Top Priority for Incoming ABA Prez
Aug 4, 2008, 03:13 pm CDT
Ex-Judge Who Blabbed About Alleged Affair With PD is Censured
Aug 4, 2008, 01:25 pm CDT
Vegas Judge Accused of Trying to Make Discipline Case a ‘Laughingstock’
Aug 4, 2008, 12:49 pm CDT
Cert Petition Claims Campaign Contributions Required Judicial Recusal
Aug 4, 2008, 07:26 am CDT
Judges Are Clients, Too
Aug 1, 2008, 08:00 pm CDT
Top Judge’s Ringing Cell Phone Disrupts Court Hearing
Aug 1, 2008, 12:17 pm CDT
Jena 6 Judge is Removed from Case
Aug 1, 2008, 11:35 am CDT
From the ABA Journal
Judicial Division News | ABA Newsroom
Save the Date

Right arrow ABA 2008 Annual Meeting - August 7-12, 2008 in New York, NY
2008 ABA Annual Meeting in New York
Click here for more information

Right arrow Section Officers Conference (SOC)
September 18-20, 2008
Chicago, IL
More information: 800/238–2667 x5705

Right arrow Traffic Court Seminar
October 15-17, 2008
New Orleans, LA
More information: 800/238–2667 x6716
Click here to download the brochure
More Events
Who's Who in the Judicial Division

Right arrow Committee Rosters

Right arrow Leadership rosters by Conference

Right arrow Committee Chairs

Right arrow Join a committee

Right arrow Judicial Division Staff
Explore the Justice Center
For the Members

Right arrow JD Photo Gallery

Right arrow Create a personalized Press Release Members Only Area

Right arrow Provide information on your upcoming eventsMembers Only Area

Right arrow Request the official Judicial Division Pin!Members Only Area
Award Information

Right arrow John Marshall Award

Right arrow Judicial Division Awards

Right arrow NCSCJ Awards
Judicial Outreach Network

Right arrow Click here to view more information on the Judicial Outreach Network
Recent Periodicals
Right arrow The Judges' Journal

Right arrow The Judicial Division Record
More Periodicals
Featured Publication

Model Code of Judicial Conduct Model Code of Judicial Conduct
passed by the House of Delegates in February 2007

Buy Now






More Publications

Back to Top
Copyright American Bar Association. http://www.abanet.org

* Topics A-Z
* Web Store
* ABA Calendar
* Contact ABA

American Bar Association

American Bar Association | 321 N. Clark St. | Chicago, IL 60654-7598 | 800.285.2221
ABA Copyright Statement ABA Privacy Statement Web Site Feedback

American Judges Association L02773316 L01432062 L24033516 jurisdoctorstud Christian Milan

About AJA Publications & Reports Educational Seminars
Affiliates & Links Essay Contest Contact Us AJA Member


Presidential Updates

* AJA President Eileen Olds participated in a roundtable discussion in Washington, DC on April 24 hosted by the Center for Court Innovation on the topic of Statewide Coordination of Problem-Solving Courts. She also extends her congratulations to AJA member Libby Hines on her receipt of the National Center for State Courts’ 2008 Distinguished Service Award (see “What’s New”).
From the President

* December '07 Email Blast

* President's Message March '08
What's New

* AJA Member Elizabeth Pollard Hines recognized by the National Center for State Courts with its 2008 Distinguished Service Award to a current or former state trial judge. Read more.

* AJA President Eileen A. Olds and Immediate Past President Steve Leben were quoted recently in the New York Times in an article titled “Race Gap: Crime & Punishment"

* The U.S. Postal Service has issued a first-class stamp that calls attention to the importance of jury service. The Jury Duty stamp can be purchased at your post office, or online at www.usps.com/shop.

* Judge Olds Inaugurated as President of AJA

*
Join Now!
*

The AJA’s White Paper Committee has unveiled AJA’s first white paper, which recommends changes throughout the court system to improve perceptions of procedural fairness in court. The paper, “Procedural Fairness: A Key Ingredient in Public Satisfaction,” is being presented as part of the AJA’s annual conference this week in Vancouver.
*

AJA Endorses Pay Raise for New York Judges
o

Background on New York Judicial Salary Issue

*

PHOTOS: Photo gallery of 2007 Annual Meeting in Vancouver, B.C.

News Releases and Articles

Dear Friends,

It is my pleasure to welcome you to the cyber home of the American Judges Association (AJA). I am hopeful that you will find what you came looking for. Please take a moment to view the information about our upcoming educational conferences. You will see that the programming is outstanding and the benefits of attending are too numerous to mention here. If you are not a member, I urge you to act now: join right now while you are online. Once your membership is confirmed, you will also have the benefit of receiving our newsletter, the Benchmark, as well as our quarterly journal, the Court Review. Both publications provide a wealth of vital information.




Photo by Fred Watkins


I have often said that though the objectives and founding principles of AJA are to promote and improve the effective administration of justice; maintain the status and independence of the judiciary; provide continuing education for its members and the general public; and allow for the exchange of ideas amongst all judges; camaraderie and collegiality among members is what gives us staying power.

I want to particularly take this opportunity to extend a personal invitation for you to join us in Maui, Hawaii, September 7-11, 2008, for this year’s Annual conference. I will be personally honored to have you in attendance. Judge Elliot Zide, the chair of the Education Committee and Judge Tam Schumann in consultation with the entire executive committee have worked tirelessly to make this a conference that will provide lasting memories.

Again, I take this opportunity to thank those members of AJA for electing me to serve as your president. I am deeply committed, and determined to see AJA retain the distinction of being “the voice of the judiciary”. We stand willing and ready to meet the challenges and complexities before us. With your help, I know we stand tall and proud.

Yours Sincerely,

Eileen A. Olds, President